Safety issues of carbon 14 dating

Warm water holds less oxygen than cold water, thus discharge from once-through cooling systems can create a “temperature squeeze” that elevates the metabolic rate for fish.

Additionally, suction pipes that are used to intake water can draw plankton, eggs and larvae into the plant’s machinery, while larger organisms can be trapped against the protective screens of the pipes.

Unfortunately not enough people realize this and take articles like this to be fact. The total energy output of nuclear is what it is, whatever the electricity generated, after a few days, everything will be converted to hear. It can provide all the power our civilization needs.

This is all fear mongering unproven dishonest writing. This is true for nuclear but also, for any electric plant that is not using power form the sun, namely Water, Wind and Saolar. The answer is no: humanity can generate 100 TIMES more energey than what it generates now, and THAT WOULD NOT CHANGE THE SURFACE TEMPERATURE. Nothing in any of these pro-nuclear comments disproves any of the above.

Rooftop solar panels do not lose ten percent of the power they generate to transmission, as happens with virtually all centralized power generators. David Freeman, former head of numerous large utilities and author of , says: “Renewables are cheaper and safer. Let’s stick to it.” No terrorist will ever threaten one of our cities by blowing up a solar panel.

The temperature increase in the bodies of water can have serious adverse effects on aquatic life.

But at least part of the cavernous underground labyrinth may never be reopened.

The , especially when compared to renewable energy, efficiency, and conservation.

And of course there’s the problem of nuclear waste.

After more than a half-century of well-funded attempts, we’ve seen no solution for the management of atomic power’s intensely radioactive waste.

Leave a Reply